Houston Police Department Officer Accused of Bigamy
I had a hard time deciding if I was going to blog about this story on my
criminal law blog or on this
family law blog. Family law won out because I decided I wanted to discuss the laws as
they relate to marriage and how long you have to wait after a
divorce is finalized before you can get married again.
In this case, the HPD police SGT is accused of marrying wife#1 in August
of 2010. Wife#1 filed a sworn affidavit with the 246
th District Court in Harris County, alleging that in May of 2011 the SGT
left her for Wife#2. Wife#1 also alleges that the SGT moved in with Wife
#2, and that at the time this affidavit was prepared (May 2011) the SGT
was also married to the Wife#2. You can see the
divorce petition here and the
sworn affidavit here. I give these facts to aid in my discussion of how the Family Code
deals with this situation. For the sake of discussion, I will also
presume the SGT did in fact get married to Wife#2 before his divorce was finalized this month to Wife#1.
First, in Texas you can only be married to one person at a time. However,
the Texas Family Code presumes that all marriages are valid marriages.
Sec. 1.101. EVERY MARRIAGE PRESUMED VALID. In order to promote the public health
and welfare and to provide the necessary records, this code specifies
detailed rules to be followed in establishing the marriage relationship.
However, in order to provide stability for those entering into the marriage
relationship in good faith and to provide for an orderly determination
of parentage and security for the children of the relationship, it is
the policy of this state to preserve and uphold each marriage against
claims of invalidity unless a strong reason exists for holding the marriage
void or voidable. Therefore, every marriage entered into in this state
is presumed to be valid unless expressly made void by Chapter 6 or unless
expressly made voidable by Chapter 6 and annulled as provided by that chapter.
Although we start off presuming that both marriages are valid, the Family
Code quickly informs us that when we are dealing with two simultaneous
marriages, we have to presume that only the second or most recent marriage
is actually valid.
Sec. 1.102. MOST RECENT MARRIAGE PRESUMED VALID. When two or more marriages of a
person to different spouses are alleged, the most recent marriage is presumed
to be valid as against each marriage that precedes the most recent marriage…
So at this point Wife#1 would have no claim to spousal maintenance or a
division of assets that were accumulated during the marriage, purely because of the Family
Code presumptions. But this can’t be the law, right? If this were
the law, you would see cases where a couple is married for 20 years and
accumulates a large community estate, and in an effort to avoid splitting
any of it with his wife a husband could run off an secretly get married
to another woman and the Family Code would presume only his second marriage
is valid. However, I cut off the last part of Section 1.102, the remainder
of the section reads as follows:
…until one who asserts the validity of a prior marriage proves the
validity of the prior marriage.
This piece of the code shifts the burden to Wife#1 to prove that her marriage
to the SGT is valid. In this case, wife# 1 supplied a valid executed marriage
license that showed she had been married by a proper church minister which
was filed with the county clerk. This meets the requirements to show a
At this point Wife#1 is able to show her marriage is valid and is eligible
to be granted a
divorce. With the ability to be divorced also comes the ability for the Family
Court to order
post-divorce maintenance and to divide the community assets.
So what now happens to the marriage with Wife#2? Is it still a good marriage?
If it is, when did it start? To answer this, we will have to turn to Chapter
6 of the Family Code to read about void marriages. The Code lists several
reasons why a marriage may be declared void, they are as follows:
CONSANGUINITY. A marriage is void if one party to the marriage is related to the other
MARRIAGE DURING EXISTENCE OF PRIOR MARRIAGE
SAME-SEX MARRIAGE OR CIVIL UNION
MARRIAGE TO MINOR
MARRIAGE TO STEPCHILD OR STEPPARENT
In this case, if Wife#2 had no idea that the SGT was still married to Wife#1,
then she could have her marriage declared void.
Sec. 6.202. MARRIAGE DURING EXISTENCE OF PRIOR MARRIAGE. (a) A marriage is void if entered into when either party has an existing
marriage to another person that has not been dissolved by legal action
or terminated by the death of the other spouse.
(b) The later marriage that is void under this section becomes valid when
the prior marriage is dissolved if, after the date of the dissolution,
the parties have lived together as husband and wife and represented themselves
to others as being married.
However, if Wife#2 is still residing with the SGT when his divorce to Wife#1
is finalized, and they hold themselves out to be married to other people,
Wife#2 will be considered married to the SGT as of 30 days after the SGT’s
As for the criminal aspect of this case, the possible crime is called bigamy
and is detailed in the following Texas Penal Code Section:
Sec. 25.01. BIGAMY. (a) An individual commits an offense if:
(1) he is legally married and he:
(A) purports to marry or does marry a person other than his spouse in this
state, or any other state or foreign country, under circumstances that
would, but for the actor's prior marriage, constitute a marriage; or
(B) lives with a person other than his spouse in this state under the appearance
of being married; or
(2) he knows that a married person other than his spouse is married and he:
(A) purports to marry or does marry that person in this state, or any other
state or foreign country, under circumstances that would, but for the
person's prior marriage, constitute a marriage; or
(B) lives with that person in this state under the appearance of being married.
(b) For purposes of this section, "under the appearance of being married"
means holding out that the parties are married with cohabitation and an
intent to be married by either party.
(c) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(1) that the actor
reasonably believed at the time of the commission of the offense that
the actor and the person whom the actor married or purported to marry
or with whom the actor lived under the appearance of being married were
legally eligible to be married because the actor's prior marriage
was void or had been dissolved by death, divorce, or annulment. For purposes
of this subsection, an actor's belief is reasonable if the belief
is substantiated by a certified copy of a death certificate or other signed
document issued by a court.
(d) For the purposes of this section, the lawful wife or husband of the
actor may testify both for or against the actor concerning proof of the
(e) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree, except
that if at the time of the commission of the offense, the person whom
the actor marries or purports to marry or with whom the actor lives under
the appearance of being married is:
(1) 16 years of age or older, the offense is a felony of the second degree; or
(2) younger than 16 years of age, the offense is a felony of the first degree.
From reading the bigamy statute, you can see we clearly do not have enough
information to really discuss this case as a bigamy case, since we do
not know if the SGT is actually married to wife #2 or not, but if he is…it
could be trouble.
Slate & Associates, Attorneys at Law, we offer a full range of family law and legal services including
child custody and
grandparent visitation and
custody, etc. We have
3 Houston area locations including Deer Park, Houston, and Porter, Texas. Call our offices today
and we can set an appointment with an attorney: (281) 407-9254.